| |
Kobe's Number Called, Learns:
No Man Is Safe in Western Civilized Nations
July 29, 2003
by Ed Ward, MD
On July 1, 2003 Kobe Bryant learned about the current draconian laws that can
be applied, at a minimum, anytime a man does not have
video and audio surveillance of a one on one encounter with a female. Bryant
called for room service sometime after 10 p.m. and was told it was
not available. After the wanna-be starlet's shift
was over at 11 p.m., she "decided
to go up to his room". First hand accounts place
her in the room for 20 minutes to 2 hours. When hotel staff went to the room
to investigate a noise complaint, she left the room. The assault
allegation did not come until the next day. There are reports that police had been called to the accuser's home during
the last year and reports of "emotional upheavals" leading to a physician's care. These
appear to be the only corroborated facts. Now, Kobe has to
try and prove he is innocent of assault or even rape. For
the burden of proof is now on the innocent proving innocence, rather than, the state proving guilt.
In the current hysteria over assault on women, assault/rape can
be measured in seconds or not clearly stating "yes". Even a signed statement of consent is assault/rape. If a female
partner has been drinking, it is assault/rape. The claim needs no proof other than the accusers statement of assault/rape and
intercourse. The reasons for the accusation are innumerous
and can happen at anytime to any male. Do you have documentation
proving your innocence right now? Do you have documentation
proving your innocence for 5 years ago? If you are old enough,
like the Governor-General of Australia, do you have documentation
proving your innocence from 35 years ago?
Assault/rape has been alleged by an
employee when she was angry at hotel guests. Another
female was embarrassed over consensual sex. A Rico conspiracy just needed some cash. One female of the Tailhook scandal
didn't want her fiance to find out about her sexual indiscretions. A
female found the sexual assault charge would be fine when she
was criticized for her work performance. Others find the assault/rape
accusation better on the third try. The most influential assault/rape
lie was used to obtain an abortion and garner sympathy for
the cause of Roe vs. Wade. NOW built their political
base and power on lying propaganda. The scheme is perpetuated
even NOW. One
retrospective study revealed
a 41% false accusation rate as admitted by the accuser.
But, by far, the most frequent false assault allegations occur
in divorces, where an attorney might even be guilty of malpractice
if he does not inform his client of the huge potential benefit
of claiming an unsubstantiated assault charge. Estimates
of the restraining orders for assault are in the range of
1.7 million instances a year in the US. In 2000, in Massachusetts
alone, 24,000 of the 36,000
restraining orders issued were not even for the claim of abuse,
but, the mere unsubstantiated claim of "fear of abuse".
These unsubstantiated claims of assault will not only make you
have to prove your innocence. They will cost you your home,
children, future finances, firearms, freedom, job and quite possibly
your life.
In the UK, assault/rape was alleged for a book deal. In Wales, a female stalker
alleged assault/rape on another athlete. A Canadian alderman, while visiting in Montana, alleged assault/rape
as cover for a "road trip". In Scotland, an autobiographer
claimed rape/assault to spice
up her book. In Australia, the Governor-General was accused in a civil suit of an assault/rape
that supposedly happened in either 1965 or 1966. No western
civilized nation provides a safe haven for male persecution.
No matter the outcome, this incident will be added to the climbing
assault statistics attributed to "improved reporting". Whether,
true or false, the accusations are counted as proof of the
need for less Constitutional rights for men. Even if proven
innocent after defamation, legal expenses, personal trauma or
complete destruction. There is very little and usually no
recourse to the false accuser. In fact, in false accusations
of domestic violence, assault, rape and child neglect, there are
laws that protect the false accuser from any legal recourse.
Just one of the nails in the coffin has Kobe Bryant's name on
it. But, the name on the headstone is "Men". Your
number, like Kobe's, has been cued into the system.
The only question that remains to be answered is, "Are
you the next number to be called?".
This article originally appeared on
Men's
News Daily.
Other articles by the author:
Men's Health: As Interpreted by Our
Government?,
The
U.S. Constitution: Partially Revived on June 25, 2003
also covered by
the Sierra Times,
It's Almost Official; Abuse U.S.
Courts for Power and Profit and
The Media Continues to
Hide Family Court's Constitutional Abuses and the Resulting Suicides;
First Official
U.S. Oligarchy: Judiciary Openly Joins Elected Officials to Seize Nevada;
8 Years of DV
Intervention: 100 Years of Denial of Father's Rights.
| |
