-- explore the new feminism -- introduction | interaction | information |
ifeminists.com > introduction > editorials |
As someone who mans a 24 hr help line
in the UK for male victims of domestic violence I am struck by the
amount of men who tell me that the police refuse to either take their
complaints seriously, ignore them entirely, arrest the victim or fail
to arrest the perpetrator. In the last six months I have had over 400
calls. Probably 70% claim that the police have acted in one
of the ways above. Not only is this unjust it is also a large part of
the reason that the domestic violence figures relating to male
victims are so low. At the moment in the UK there is yet
another blitz on domestic violence. Once more the air is thick with
hysteria and false statistics. A newspaper has embarked on a naming
and shaming campaign and the television is full of dramas and talk
shows, all depicting horror stories of brutal deranged men who batter
women. Women's groups are demonstrating outside jails trying to get
women who killed their allegedly abusive husbands out of their
sentences despite the public will as expressed by a jury. Naturally,
men who suffer domestic violence also get a mention. A small aside
that usually goes something like this: "While we know that 95% of
all victims of domestic violence are female, we should say that some
men also suffer." I think this is supposed to give those of us who
have been on the receiving end of this violence a small warm feeling
in the heart that we have been noticed. Well, it does not. What it
does give us is a huge pain in the rump! For a start, the figure is a
lie and those who repeat it know it is a lie. I will not go into
detail here about the largest domestic violence study ever carried
out in Britain proving that men and women suffer equally in the home
when it come to abuse. Neither will I rant and rave about the huge
amounts of studies world wide that have shown the same. Instead I
decided to write and ask the head of Britain's police forces to
explain why his officers seem intent on ignoring male victims also.
The letter I wrote to him is below. Perhaps those of you reading
this, and in possession of a conscience, would like to write to this
man and ask him similar questions? In case I manage to stir anyone
from their apathy I have included his e-mail address. Sir John Stevens QPM As commissioner of police can you
tell me why the police in your employ constantly refuse to give male
victims of domestic violence justice, refuse to arrest and prosecute
female perpetrators, give poor, misleading and false advice and
actively talk men and boys out of pressing charges against women who
commit violence against them? All behaviours that guarantee the
figures of reported crimes against female perpetrators remain low? I would like you to be aware that
this organisation, along with several others, are keeping accurate
details of the men this policy is affecting and serious questions
will be asked of the police about this behaviour in the future. We
regard this manipulation by the police, that masks the reality of
domestic violence between the sexes, as most sinister and, at best, a
huge dereliction of duty. As commissioner we hold you responsible for
the over all behaviour of the officers under your authority and we
hereby make a formal request that you act immediately to stop this
outrageous and sexist behaviour. Furthermore, we demand that when
male victims contact your domestic violence officers they are given
valid advice and their cases are investigated as rigorously as any
other person, irrespective of their age or gender. We would like to
remind you that the police are public servants and their duty is to
serve and protect the whole of the public and not just 50% of it.
Abused men and their children need and deserve the same amount of
protection under the law as anyone else. While we at man2man support
and applaud your current campaign against domestic violence we
deplore the fact that, yet again, you fail to point out that men are
suffering also and at a level on a par with women. (See the largest
domestic violence survey ever carried out: 1996 BCS for the
evidence).
Please do not bother to reply with
the usual PR spin that the police are gender neutral and always act
in a professional manner. We have mounting evidence that this is a
false view and if it is one you believe then we suggest you are
dangerously unaware of what is happening in your own police stations
around the country. man2man and its members await your
reply with interest. Sir John's e-mail address is:
commissioner@met.police.uk
Feel free to drop him a note asking him
about this behaviour. Who knows, you may change things for the better
for thousands of decent men. The question remains, why are the
police acting in this way? Have they been programmed at some secret
brainwashing camp to hate their fellow men by ranks of radical
feminists dripping drool and carrying severed penises? Maybe senior
police officers are all masons and their political masters indulge in
ritualistic hypnosis sessions, making these normally august public
figures loathe and detest any statistic, study or event that shows
some women are violent? Possibly, and though I doubt it I cannot
discount it entirely. The Masons are a very weird bunch and so are
radical feminists. I think it is more likely that these things happen
over a gin and tonic in a golf club bar.
A man contacted me recently and told me
that the police and a judge in court both told him that his
complaints about domestic abuse from his wife had no relevance to the
fact that she had changed the locks on his house while he was at work
and refused to let him back in. Now forced to sleep on his mothers
couch he telephoned me in a state of utter bewilderment. He explained
that he had photographs of his injuries and doctors reports detailing
the abuse he had suffered for years. Apparently his lawyer also felt
they were irrelevant and advised him not to submit them to the judge.
He did so anyway but the evidence seems to have cut no ice. Being a
man in the 21st century seems to be a distinct disadvantage. The good news is that men everywhere
have had enough! Since the newspaper began its vitriolic
campaign my telephone has not stopped ringing. Man after man has
called saying, "Why are we being left out and what are you doing
about it?" One man, aged 80 years old even promised to leave my
organisation £250,000 in his will to help with the fight. Men
are getting angry and angry men are capable of achieving anything.
Once their apathy has been shaken off they can and will do whatever
it takes to win back the initiative. Some men will act stupidly and
that worries me deeply but, most will act responsibly and with great
restraint and those are the men I welcome. The days of this official denial of the
rights of man are coming to an end. Let all those responsible for
these outrageous and unjust abuses of power learn to tremble.
They will be held to account and they
will pay. George Rolph, London, October 2003.
|
ifeminists.com > home | introduction | interaction | information | about |
ifeminists.com is edited by Wendy McElroy; it is made possible by support from The Independent Institute and members like you.