For the past 30 years I have followed the trajectory of feminism.
Originally I was an ardent supporter of the ideology. But 15 years ago,
it became clear that this religion of gender liberation had lost its
moral compass.
Now, feminism has become a parody of the very ideals it claims to
promote. It was this dialectic that led me to research this series of
articles on Socialism and Feminism. The research has lead to these
conclusions:
1. The basic premise of radical feminism is that being a wife and mother
is inherently exploitative of women. This paradigm originated in the
Marxist
analysis of class relationships in Europe in the mid-1800s.
2. Over the past 100 years, many feminist leaders have
openly
aligned themselves with socialist ideology.
3. Beginning in the 1920s, socialist thinkers realized that capitalism
could never be overthrown by violent means. So they conspired to
undermine
the values and institutions of Western society. This set up
what we now call the Culture War.
4. Radical feminists have worked at the vanguard of the Culture War.
Their range of tactics is astonishing:
5. Both socialism and radical feminism operate through deception. While
both ideologies claim to be merely working for equality, in fact they
aspire to radically restructure the entire society.
So is radical feminism a socialist front? In a word, Yes.
Read just a few paragraphs from Kate Weigand's book,
Red Feminism.
Or go to the Women and
Marxism website and you will
see the speeches of the Communist rascals that were calculated to whip
up women into a revolutionary hysteria.
The radical feminist worldview, goals, tactics, and rhetoric -- all can
be linked directly to Marxist-Leninist theory.
Ironically, it is doubtful that Marxism has liberated women. Modern
women are no more independent than they were 150 years ago in
patriarchal Europe.
Fem-socialism has only shifted female dependency to big government and
to feminist Pooh Bahs who deem to dictate what women will think, feel,
and do. No wonder women are feeling victimized, angry, and lonely.
So if feminist-socialist theory has failed women, where does that leave
us?
Clearly, the roles of women -- and men -- are evolving. The answer to
the age-old Woman Question is not to return to the restrictive gender
roles of the 19th century.
Let's first acknowledge the fact that life has never been a bowl of
cherries -- for either women or men. Both suffered terribly from abuses
specific to their gender.
Let's also note that rights and responsibilities go hand in hand. The
more rights any group acquires must be accompanied by a similar increase
in social obligations.
And finally, let's stop the gender epithets which have the effect of
shaming and silencing men.
The myths of fem-socialism are deeply embedded in the fabric of Western
society. These myths need to be exposed and debunked.
At the same time, why don't we commence a real gender dialog in this
country?
