For eight years California courts have permitted
children of divorce to be moved hundreds or thousands of
miles away from the fathers they love and need.
Last week the California Supreme Court issued an
historic opinion which clarifies current case law and
reaffirms the importance of both parents in a child's
life.
Since 1996, move-away determinations have been based on
the Burgess decision, in which a custodial mother
was allowed to move her two children 40 miles away from
their father. Burgess has been disastrous for
children because it has been interpreted by California
courts to permit moves of hundreds or thousands of
miles. In some cases, courts have even allowed children
to be moved out of the country, as far away as
Australia, New Zealand, and Zaire.
In LaMusga, a Contra Costa County custodial
mother sought to move to Ohio with her two young boys.
The father fought the move, arguing that moving would be
harmful to his children because it would damage their
relationship with him.
The trial court decided in the father's favor. However,
the First District Court of Appeal reversed, declaring
that as long as the move-away is not done in "bad
faith," the custodial mother has the right to move with
her children unless the father could prove that, in the
event of a move, awarding him custody was "essential" to
his children's well-being.
In LaMusga, the Supreme Court ruled that
"essential" is an unreasonably high standard and that
lower courts have been misinterpreting Burgess by
placing their focus on the custodial parent's perceived
rights instead of on the well-being of children. The
Court wrote:
"The likely impact of the proposed move on the
noncustodial parent's relationship with the children is
a relevant factor in determining whether the move would
cause detriment to the children and...may be sufficient to
justify a change in custody."
During oral arguments the Court appeared concerned about
the distance issue in move-aways, particularly after one
of the mother's attorneys told the Court that while the
Burgess case involved a move within the same
county, he believed the custodial parent's right to move
remained the same when applied to interstate or even
international moves. In strengthening the ability of
trial courts to restrain move-aways, the opinion lists
distance among the most prominent factors to be
considered.
One reason California move-aways need to be reined in
is the strong financial incentive for California
custodial parents to move. California has a high child
support guideline, a high cost of living, and high
wages. Thus custodial parents can often live better by
moving to other states (or other countries), which have
a lower cost of living, because they will still collect
child support awards based on California wages and
support guidelines.
Beyond the harm done to children by separating them from
a loving parent, it is also a terrible injustice to
noncustodial parents who often must stay behind to work
to pay child support for children who have been moved
out of their lives. Move-aways highlight the hypocrisy
of the current public policy and discourse on
fatherhood, wherein men are lectured to take
responsibility for their children while at the same time
courts and lawmakers frequently disregard their right to
remain a meaningful part of their children's lives.
At the heart of many move-away decisions is the question
"do fathers matter or not?" Research overwhelmingly
demonstrates that they do: the rates of school dropouts,
teenage pregnancy, juvenile crime, and teen drug abuse
are more tightly correlated with fatherlessness than
with any other major socioeconomic factor, including
income and race.
The custodial mother in LaMusga has emphasized
the economic advantages of her move, and newspapers
report that she is happy that the new home she was able
to purchase after moving her children out of state is
spacious and has a pool. But is a bigger house and a
pool more important than a father?
This column first appeared in the
San Francisco Chronicle (5/4/04).
Jeffery M. Leving is one of America's most prominent family law
attorneys. He is the author of the book Fathers' Rights: Hard-hitting
and Fair Advice for Every Father Involved in a Custody Dispute.
His website is dadsrights.com.
Glenn Sacks is a radio talk show host and
columnist on men's and fathers' issues.
His nationally syndicated radio show,
His Side with Glenn Sacks,
can be heard every Sunday in Los Angeles and Seattle.