Kentucky
judge D. Michael "Mickey" Foellger has offered men
who are behind on their child support obligations a
choice: have a vasectomy or spend 30 days in jail.
However, according to a new study of child support,
it is Kentucky's child support guidelines which need
surgery, not so-called "deadbeat dads."
The study, "Child
Support Guidelines and the Equalization of Living
Standards," was conducted by psychology professors
Sanford Braver and David Stockburger and will appear
in the soon to be released book The Law and
Economics of Child Support Payments.
Braver and Stockburger conclude that "under current
child support guidelines, the majority of custodial
parents currently have higher standards of living
than their matched noncustodial parents." Of the
seven states they studied, Kentucky's guidelines are
among the most inequitable.
In addition to
unreasonably high support levels, Kentucky
noncustodial fathers also have to contend with a
rigid child support system which is often impervious
to the economic realities of modern life. Fathers
who are laid off, suffer wage cuts, or are injured
on the job are often unable to get downward
modifications on their child support. In such cases,
the amounts owed mount quickly, as do interest and
penalties.
Compounding the
problem is the fact that the federal Bradley
amendment bars judges from retroactively forgiving
child support arrearages, even when they determine
that the arrearage occurred through no fault of the
obligor. As shared parenting advocates Dianna
Thompson and Murray Davis of the National Family
Justice Association note, "Society holds
noncustodial parents, mostly fathers, to an
unattainable standard to never become physically or
mentally ill, never get disabled, and to never lose
a job or get laid off in a poor economy."
The pot of child
support gold--which hard-line judges and Attorneys
General often insist they're going to find if we'd
just get tough on deadbeats--simply does not exist.
Numerous studies, including the largest federally
funded study of divorced fathers ever conducted,
have shown that unemployment, not willful neglect,
is the leading cause of child support
noncompliance.
A look at
Kentucky's list of top 10 "Most Wanted Parents"
illustrates the point. Far from being a list of
well-heeled lawyers, accountants and bankers, only
one of the 10 "deadbeats" listed appears to have any
education at all, and the most common designation
for occupation is "laborer." These men do low wage
and often seasonal work, and owe large sums of money
which most could never hope to pay off.
Judge Foellger says
his "vasectomy or jail" edict is only given to men
have fallen $10,000 behind on their child support
and who have had four or more children with three or
more women. While Foellger is correct in condemning
these men's irresponsible conduct, one might wonder
why the mothers of their children receive neither
sanction nor condemnation. They too had kids whom
they evidently cannot afford to support.
Foellger insists
he's not forcing sterilization on anybody, since the
offenders in his court can choose 30 days in jail
instead. However, most men who fall behind on child
support have led law-abiding lives and legitimately
fear for their safety and mental stability if they
are incarcerated.
For example, in
McCracken County earlier this year a man slit his
throat in the courtroom after being sentenced to two
years in jail for being $7,000 behind on child
support. According to newspaper accounts, the man
pleaded to the judge "Don't put me in jail, I'm
going to kill myself" before taking out a razor
blade.
By threatening to
jail the men, Foellger is in effect impelling them
to get sterilized. In fact, Foellger says that all
but one of the men offered his "deal" have chosen
vasectomy over jail.
This represents a
serious human rights violation. Kentucky's child
support guidelines need to be overhauled to ensure
that support obligations are in line with obligors'
ability to pay. In addition, the system needs to be
more flexible and responsive, so men who are down on
their luck don't become criminalized. And while the
public may be legitimately annoyed with these
"deadbeats," nobody should be jailed or sterilized
for the "crime" of being poor.
This column first appeared in the
Cincinnati Post and the Kentucky Post (5/12/04).
Jeffery M. Leving is one of America's most prominent family law
attorneys. He is the author of the book Fathers' Rights: Hard-hitting
and Fair Advice for Every Father Involved in a Custody Dispute.
His website is dadsrights.com.
Glenn Sacks is
a men's and fathers' issues columnist and
a talk show host on KMPC AM 1540 in Los Angeles.
His columns have appeared in dozens of America's largest newspapers.