The California Assembly just passed a misguided bill which puts
ideology over evidence by reiterating the state's mulish
definition of domestic violence as something which only women
suffer. Not only does Assemblymember Rebecca Cohn's AB 2051 turn
a blind eye to male DV victims and their children, it may also
cost the state tens of millions of dollars in lost federal
grants.
California law defines domestic
violence as "the infliction or threat of physical harm
against...female intimate partners." AB 2051 refers to domestic
violence victims only as "battered women." By defining domestic
violence as something only experienced by women, both existing
law and AB 2051 exclude male victims and their children from
receiving state-funded domestic violence services, including
shelter, hotel arrangements, counseling and legal services.
According to the Centers for
Disease Control, men comprise over 35% of all domestic violence
victims. A meta-analytic review of 552 domestic violence studies
published in the Psychological Bulletin found that 38% of
the physical injuries in heterosexual domestic assaults are
suffered by men.
The National Institute of Mental
Health funded and oversaw two of the largest studies of domestic
violence ever conducted, both of which found equal rates of
abuse between husbands and wives. California State Long Beach
University professor Martin Fiebert maintains an online
bibliography summarizing 174 scholarly investigations, with an
aggregate sample size exceeding 160,000, which conclude "women
are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in
their relationships with their spouses or male partners."
Further, a number of these studies
contradict the common claim that women usually strike in
self-defense, and demonstrate that abusive women use weapons and
the element of surprise to help compensate for their smaller
size.
These cases sometimes turn tragic
for fathers and their children. In the Socorro Caro murder case,
Socorro often abused her husband Xavier, a prominent Northridge,
California rheumatologist, once assaulting him so badly he had
to have surgery to regain his sight in one eye. Because the
domestic violence, criminal justice and family law systems are
almost incapable of seeing a man as a DV victim, Xavier couldn't
take his children and leave. Because of his wife's violent
nature, he couldn't walk away and leave his children behind.
Socorro later shot and killed three of their four children, for
which she was convicted and sentenced to death.
California is currently the target
of a controversial lawsuit filed on behalf of a young
Sacramento-area woman who spent a nightmarish childhood trapped
in a home with a violent, abusive mother. Maegan Black's father
David was partially disabled, and thus financially dependent on
his wife. His and Maegan's numerous attempts to get help from
domestic violence service providers were consistently
rebuffed--David was excluded because he was the wrong gender for
a victim. AB 2051 could weaken the state's legal position by
reiterating this exclusion.
The federal Violence Against Women
Act, which funds states' DV programs through STOP grants, was
amended last year to include a requirement that DV programs be
gender neutral. It was also amended to state that VAWA's title
should not "be construed to prohibit male victims of domestic
violence...from receiving benefits and services." AB 2051 again
places California at odds with federal law, putting the state at
risk of losing tens of millions of dollars in STOP grant funds.
The California Alliance for
Families and Children has organized a petition against the bill
signed by 50 prominent domestic violence researchers and
treatment providers. The signatories call on California to stop
ignoring male victims and their children, and note:
"The data is without question --
domestic violence affects both men and women. The politicization
of this issue must stop and services must be provided to all
children and their parent victims."
The group is comprised of many of
the biggest names in the domestic violence field, including:
author and psychologist Don Dutton, who served as a domestic
violence expert on the prosecution team in the OJ Simpson trial;
author and criminologist Denise A. Hines, PhD; longtime domestic
violence researcher Murray A. Straus, whose co-authored 1980
book Behind Closed Doors: Violence in American Families
helped launch the movement to help battered women; author and
psychologist Kathleen Malley-Morrison; author and psychologist
Patricia Noller, former director of the University of Queensland
Family Centre; domestic violence treatment provider Mary Susan
Convery, MSW, LCSW; author and psychology professor Marlene
Moretti, PhD; psychology professor John Archer, Ph.D., former
president of the International Society for Research on
Aggression; California domestic violence treatment provider Mike
Carolla, MFT; clinical psychologist Jennifer
Langhinrichsen-Rohling; Laura Petracek, PhD, LCSW, who helped
develop the Harborview Hospital Anger Management and Domestic
Violence Program for Women; forensic psychologist Dr. Tonia
Nicholls; Jan Brown, founder and Executive Director of the
Domestic Abuse Helpline for Men and Women; Philip Cook,
Executive Director for Stop Abuse for Everyone and the author of
Abused Men: The Hidden Side of Domestic Violence;
psychologist Dr. Reena Sommer; certified domestic violence
counselor L. Darlene Pratt; Deborah J. Burkes, director of a
court-certified batterer intervention program in Contra Costa
County, California; Terry W. Gilbert, director of Capitol Anger
Management, which provides court-certified batterer intervention
programs; and court-certified batterer intervention provider
John Hamel, LCSW, author of Gender-Inclusive Treatment of
Intimate Partner Abuse: A Comprehensive Approach.
In his testimony against AB 2051
Hamel asserted:
"AB 2051 deliberately ignores
heterosexual males, even though they account for half of all
domestic violence victims and incur approximately one third of
domestic violence related injuries...there is an overwhelming,
irrefutable body of research indicating that children are
adversely affected by witnessing interparental violence
regardless of the perpetrator's gender. Boys and girls who have
seen their mother physically assault their father are just as
likely as those who witnessed their father assault their mother
to perpetrate dating violence as adolescents and assault their
intimate partners in adulthood. Research also finds that
parents who assault one another are also likely to also assault
their children, and this correlation holds equally for mothers
and fathers. By ignoring the problem of female-on-male
violence, Cohn's bill inhibits our common efforts to effectively
combat domestic violence in our communities."
Cohn introduced AB 2051 to address
the problem of domestic violence within the Gay, Lesbian,
Bisexual and Transgender communities. This is commendable, since
research shows that domestic violence occurs as often in gay and
lesbian couples as it does in heterosexual ones. The bill also
provided Cohn the opportunity to correct California's harmful
(and potentially costly) error of ignoring male DV victims and
their children. Rather than fixing this problem, Cohn has
instead chosen to exacerbate it.
Mike McCormick is the Executive Director of the
American Coalition for Fathers
and Children, the world's largest shared parenting organization.
Glenn Sacks' columns on men's and fathers' issues have appeared in dozens of
America's largest newspapers. Glenn can be reached via his website at
www.GlennSacks.com
This is an expanded version of an article
which first appeared in the Daily Breeze [Los Angeles]
(6/1/06).