Call it the backlash against the backlash. Over
the past decade, Americans have increasingly understood
that the divorce revolution, fatherlessness and
single parent households are harming our children.
Now those who view the traditional family as disadvantageous
to women are firing back, defending women who choose
single motherhood and depicting fathers as superfluous.
Last fall Stanford
University Gender Scholar Peggy Drexler penned the
highly-publicized book Raising Boys Without Men:
How Maverick Moms Are Creating the Next Generation
of Exceptional Men. This month Oxford Press
released Wellesley College Women's Studies Professor
Rosanna Hertz's Single by Chance, Mothers by
Choice: How Women Are Choosing Parenthood Without
Marriage and Creating the New American Family.
Certainly one can sympathize
with those single mothers whose husbands or lovers
abandoned or mistreated them, and who soldiered
on in the raising of their children without the
father those children should have had. However,
Drexler and Hertz go well beyond this, openly advocating
single motherhood as a lifestyle choice.
Drexler portrays father-absent
homes--particularly "single mother by choice" and
lesbian homes--as being the best environments for
raising boys. Hertz interviewed 65 single mothers
and concluded that "intimacy between husbands and
wives [is] obsolete as the critical familial bond."
Whereas a family was once defined as two parents
and their children, Hertz asserts that today the
"core of family life is the mother and her children."
Fathers aren't necessary--"only the availability
of both sets of gametes [egg and sperm] is essential."
In fact, Hertz explains, "what men offer today is
obsolete."
Our children would
beg to differ. Studies of children of divorce confirm
their powerful desire to retain strong connections
to their fathers. For example, an Arizona State
University study of college-age children of divorce
found that the overwhelming majority believed that
after a divorce "living equal amounts of time with
each parent is the best arrangement for children."
Objective measures of child well-being belie Hertz's
and Drexler's rose-colored image of fatherless families.
The rates of the four major youth pathologies--teen
pregnancy, teen drug abuse, school dropouts and
juvenile crime--are tightly correlated with fatherlessness,
often more so than with any other socioeconomic
factor.
For example, a long-term
study of teen pregnancy rates was conducted in the
United States and in New Zealand and published in
the Society for Research in Child Development's
journal Child Development. The study concluded
that a father's absence greatly increases the risk
of teen pregnancy. The researchers found that it
mattered little whether the child was rich or poor,
black or white, born to a teen mother or an adult
mother, or raised by parents with functional or
dysfunctional marriages. What mattered was dad.
Part of the problem
is that Hertz and Drexler have reached their conclusions
through flawed methodology. Both studied families
who volunteered to have their lives intimately examined
over a multi-year period--a self-selected sample
hardly representative of the average fatherless
family. Moreover, Hertz's and Drexler's research
is largely subjective and suffers from confirmatory
bias. Both are passionate advocates for single mothers.
They personally conducted interviews of single mothers
to examine their family lives and--no surprise--found
them to their liking.
To Hertz's credit,
she does concede that the "wish among heterosexual
women for a dad for their children remains strong."
Perhaps the single mothers she interviewed understand
the value of male parenting? Or as these women's
children grow the mothers see the positive impact
male influence could have in their lives? Not according
to Hertz. She explains, "it is not that they believe
men provide a critical difference in perspective
that women cannot supply." Instead, Hertz asserts
that the single mothers she studied included some
men in their children's lives as a way to "connect
their children to male privilege." In fact, those
who include men in their daughters' lives do so
because they want "their daughters to know male
privilege when they encounter it and to be prepared
to combat it."
Both Hertz and Drexler
assert that there are plenty of replacements for
fathers and a married, two-parent family. Hertz
says single mothers happily substitute "social nesting"
for fathers. She explains:
"The women I studied
celebrated motherhood by including their close friends
and families in the early milestones of parenthood.
They were not mother and child against the world
but part of a broader group of people chosen--and
willing--to support them."
Drexler holds up a
wide collection of males--"grandfathers, godfathers,
uncles, family friends, coaches"--who can stand in
as fathers for the boys of single mother households.
Yet while those serving in social nests or as father
figures can be positives for children, they usually
have little real stake in a child's life, and are
a poor substitute for a father's love and devotion
to his children.
One of Hertz's interviewees,
Melissa, had kids via a sperm donor. She says that
when her kids ask where their father is, she'll
"just tell them the basics, which is 'your father
is in California.'" Another interviewee, Joy, wanted
a known donor to be the "father" of her fatherless
baby, but was reminded that this could create legal
complications. "I could not imagine having a known
donor who was not also a dad to my child," she told
Hertz. So Joy decided to find a husband and have
children within the marriage? Nope--Joy had another
solution in mind. "I decided to use an anonymous
donor," she explains.
Hertz and Drexler fail
to understand how powerfully children hunger for
their fathers. For example, famed athlete Bo Jackson
devoted the first chapter of his autobiography
Bo Knows Bo not to his many achievements,
but instead to the father he didn't have. Jackson's
angry, unhappy childhood was defined by his father
hunger. He explained that when he wanted something,
"I could beat on other kids and steal...[but] I couldn't
steal a father. I couldn't steal a father's hug
when I needed one." Jackson saw his older brother
go to a penal institution, feared he would end up
there as well, and longed for the discipline and
strong hand a father provides.
In Whatever Happened
to Daddy's Little Girl?, award-winning journalist
Jonetta Rose Barras describes her fatherless childhood
as "one long, empty night." After her parents broke
up, she explains:
"I missed him desperately...he
made me feel loved; he made me feel wanted... sometimes
I sat on a bench or on the curb, like a lost, homeless
child. I waited for [dad] to drive through, recognize
me, and take me with him. On the bus, I searched
each man's features; I did not want mistakenly to
pass him."
Hertz, Drexler and
the mothers they interviewed are equally in the
dark as to the immense benefits reaped by the children
who do have fathers in their lives. MSNBC anchor
Tim Russert wrote the book Big Russ and Me
about his father in 2004, and says he soon received
an "avalanche" of letters from men and women who
wanted to tell him about their own dads. Russert's
current bestseller Wisdom of Our Fathers: Lessons
and Letters from Daughters and Sons was drawn
from those 60,000 letters. The letter writers remembered
their fathers as strong, devoted, honorable--and
central to their lives. What particularly struck
Russert was the overwhelming outpouring of love
from women towards their fathers.
These sentiments wouldn't
surprise Nobel-Prize winning novelist Toni Morrison.
When asked how she became a great writer--what books
she had read and what methods she had used--she
replied:
"That is not why I
am a great writer. I am a great writer because when
I was a little girl and walked into the room where
my father was sitting, his eyes would light up.
That is why I am a great writer. That is why. There
isn't any other reason."
Men are often stereotyped
as fearing commitment, and it is they who are usually
blamed for the divorce revolution. However, it is
mothers, not fathers, who initiate most divorces
involving children. In some cases, these mothers
have ample justification. In others, however, they
simply don't want to make the compromises and do
the hard work required in any relationship, and
can't or won't recognize that their children need
their fathers. In fact, according to research conducted
by Joan Berlin Kelly, author of Surviving the
Break-up, 50 percent of divorced mothers claim
to "see no value in the father's continued contact
with his children after a divorce."
These attitudes are
very destructive. At the core of Hertz's and Drexler's
work is a "you go girl" belief that mothers can
do it alone and always know best. Unfortunately,
many women are choosing the lifestyle Hertz and
Drexler extol. It's our children who are suffering
for it.
This is an extended version
of a column which first appeared in World Net Daily (9/28/06).
To read the column as published,
click here.
Jeffery
M. Leving is the author of the book Fathers' Rights: Hard-hitting and
Fair Advice for Every Father Involved in a Custody
Dispute. His website is
www.dadsrights.com.
Glenn Sacks'
columns on men's and fathers' issues have appeared in dozens of
America's largest newspapers.